Posted on by — 1 Comment

The moment has finally come… (Version Fr en dessous)

 

 

 

 

…for me to post the interview of Rise N Shine!

But first, I’d like to wish Lance the best of luck with his move to Florida as it’s not only half way across the world, it’s also a HUGE change of way of life and a totally different culture. Hat’s off to you Lance!

 

So a couple of weeks back, I had the opportunity to sit down with and interview two skydivers who have mentored other skydivers, spent plenty of time fun jumping, one even started a business and all the while, they managed to win the Canadian nationals for Artistic Freeflying.

Bruno and Olga are the two “faces” of Rise N Shine. I say faces as they are the two who are seen on camera, however as we’re about to learn, Artistic FF is a whole different ballgame. The camera person is considered a part of the team and so (s)he has an effect on the final score the team tallies.

Here’s a video of one of their competitions:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaU8OfAlMWY&feature=plcp[/youtube]

 

Adam: So can you guys tell me, what exactly is the difference between Artistic Freeflying and VFS (Vertical Formation Skydiving)?

Bruno: Artistic freeflying encompasses all the positions that are involved in skydiving, be it sitfly, head up, head down, back flying, belly flying, whereas VFS is usually head down or sit flying and is usually a 4 person team. In VFS you aim to get the most points by doing predefined figures in the sky. In Artistic, you are scored for the quality of your presentation. The person filming is just as important as the people flying in front of the camera. You have to implicate the person in your show. You are also ranked on the difficulty of the moves you attempt.

Olga: You’re putting on a show for the people watching the video.

 

Adam: Sort of like figure skating?

Olga: Yes, but in freefall.

 

Adam: So how did you two meet? It seems like you really have to know your partner well to perform well in Artistic Freefly

Olga: We were both part of the first group of instructors at SkyVenture Montreal. Because we were hired before the tunnel even opened, we flew to San Francisco to be trained

Bruno: We had been working together for two years before we decided to form a team.

 

Adam: Why Artistic freefly? Why not VFS or RW?

Bruno: Olga has had a lot more experience than I did. She’s been in many competitions and had already done some Artistic Freefly before.

 

Adam: What was the progression for Rise N Shine? I’m sure you didn’t just look at each other on the day of a tournament and say “Let’s make a team for today”

Bruno: Well, we started together in 2009. In 2010 the team was started. In 2011 we won the nationals. And now we’re here, preparing to go to the Worlds in Dubai in December.

 

Adam: How long have you two been skydiving?

Olga: My first couple of skydives were in 2003 in Russia, which were done with the round military parachutes. Then I moved to Canada in 2004, so by the time I was able to get myself organized and get around to doing my PFF it was 2005.

Bruno: I started in 1999, but I had a much slower progression, I was mostly just doing fun jumps here and there, I wasn’t paying much attention to competing, to me the sport was for fun. The motivating factor was when I got my job at SkyVenture. I realized that I was enjoying improving my skills constantly. Once I met Olga, she coached me and my skills exponentially improved. Competition was a way for us to set an objective for ourselves.

Olga: It’s a goal that we set for ourselves which had a deadline so we had no choice but to be ready by then.

 

Adam: I’m sure you’ve heard this a lot, but why do you skydive and why compete?

Olga: We do this because it helps us push new skydivers to try the sport and, more specifically, to Artistic Freefly. This discipline is relatively small in Canada, compared to the United States and Europe.

Bruno: Our primary activity is to compete, but also to Coach. It allows us to share our passions while hoping to bring more people to competitions. And hopefully have more friends to play with in the sky.

 

Adam: What competitions have you participated in? Aside of course from the SkyVenture competition a few weeks back.

Bruno: In total, we’ve participated in two tunnel competitions and the nationals once. But 2011 was mostly a team planning year where we built our strategy and formed the team properly. Before competition, there’s a lot of mental preparation, which takes a while to develop. We alsoneeded to make our preparation for the competitions efficient and effective.

Olga: We’re definitely more efficient now.

Bruno: We took 1st place in the 2011 nationals, which allows us to go to the Worlds in Dubai in December 2012. As part of our preparation for the 2012 Worlds, we’re also going to the US nationals in November.

Olga: With 2011’s experience we can much better prepare ourselves for competitions.

 

Adam: How exactly do you compete by the way?

Olga: An Artistic Freefly competition consists of seven rounds. Typically, those 7 rounds comprise of 5 rounds of open routines where the team is free to do anything they want as long as the routine, submitted to the judges is followed. Most teams will do the same routine 5 times over because it’s easier to learn one routine than it is to learn 5 different ones. Those 5 rounds are judged on the difficulty, the esthetics and the execution of the routine. There is a grid that the judges use to figure out how many points of difficulty they can attribute for the move that is done.

Bruno: The other two rounds of the competition are a bit different. You can still do whatever you like in it, but the judges set four elements to the routine that must all appear in the routine.

 

Adam: So basically if they ask for a back flip where Olga flips around you, and a barrel roll, you can do a barrel roll, then switch to head down and circle around each other, then do the flip thing?

Bruno: Yes.  But you have to keep in mind the difficulty grid. If the team chooses to do something very difficult and has sloppy execution of the move, they will end up with a lower score than a team who chooses a simpler routine and does it perfectly.

 

Adam: What’s your mission exactly?

Bruno: Our mission as a team is to train ourselves, to compete and win of course. But it’s also truly about making Artistic Freefly popular.

 

Adam: I can see a LOT of logos on your jumpsuits, who are your main sponsors?

Bruno:
Parachutisme Voltige
SkyVenture Montréal
Frankais suits
 Unites Parachute Technologies
Performance Designs
Cookie Composites
Brainshell
Float4 Interactive
Oberfeld Snowcap

Olga: Parachutisme Voltige and SkyVenture are two of our main supporters. They are directly involved in our training.

Below, a picture of Olga and Bruno sporting their sweet Frankais jumpsuits and cookie helmets (Design on the helmet by Brainshell)
(Yes, I’m aware that I’m the worst photographer ever and my shadow is in the picture haha!)

 

Adam: So you two mentioned that the cameraman is a part of the team, who is your cameraman?

Bruno: Last year we worked with Philippe Thibodeau, who acted as a cameraman and who played a very important role in launching the team. Today, our cameraman is Richard Guilbault. Philippe remains highly involved as a coach.

 

I’d like to thank Rise N Shine for taking the time to sit with me. Bruno and Philippe have both taken the time to coach me in the past and Phil even taught Geneviève (My girlfriend and photographer) to sitfly.

If ever you’re around SkyVenture and want to learn from some top level skydivers, give them a shout, they’re always happy to teach!

 

They can be found on:

Facebook

Youtube

And the Rise N Shine webpage

And of course, if ever you want to see them fly, just head to Voltige in Joliette Quebec on any given weekend, you’ve got great chances of being on a load with them!

 

Blue skies everyone!

 

Adam

*****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

 

Le moment est finalement arrivé…

… pour que je vous parle de l’entrevue de Rise N Shine!

 

Mais avant tout, j’aimerais souhaiter à Lance le meilleur dans son déménagement en Floride car ce n’est pas seulement un déménagement à l’autre bout du monde, c’est aussi un changement ÉNORME de mode de vie et une culture complètement différente. Chapeau Lance, chapeau.

 

Donc il y a quelques semaines, j’ai eu l’opportunité de m’asseoir et faire un entrevue avec deux parachutistes qui ont étés des mentors, ont eu pleins d’opportunités à faire des fun jumps, un d’entre eux à même parti une entreprise et tout cela en même temps qu’ils étaient en train de s’entrainer et même GAGNER les nationaux Canadiens de Freefly Artistique.

Bruno et Olga sont les deux “faces” de Rise N Shine. Je dis faces car ils sont les deux qui sont vus sur la caméra. Par contre, comme nous allons bientôt apprendre, le Freefly Artistique est un jeu complètement différent. Le caméraman est considéré une partie de l’équipe donc il/elle a un effet sur le pointage final de l’équipe.

 

(Plus haut, vous pouvez voir un video d’un de leurs competitions.)

 

Adam: Pouvez vous me dire quel est la différence entre le Freefly Artistique et le VRV (Vol Relatif Vertical)?

Bruno: Le Freefly Artistique inclus toutes les positions qui font partie du skydive soit le sitfly, head up, head down, back fly ou belly fly tandis qu’en VRV c’est plus souvent du head down ou du sit et d’habitude, c’est une équipe de 4 personnes. En VRV l’équipe vise d’avoir le plus de points possible en faisant plusieurs figures prédéterminés dans le ciel. En artistique,  l’équipe est mesuré pour la qualité de leur présentation. La personne qui est en train de filmer est aussi important que les personnes qui volent en avant de la caméra. On doit impliquer la personne dans le “show”. Vous êtes aussi noté sur la difficulté des manœuvres que vous tentez.

Olga: Tu es en train de faire une pièce pour la personne qui regarde la vidéo.

 

Adam: Un peu comme le patinage artistique?

Olga: Oui, mais en chute libre.

 

Adam: Comment avez-vous rencontré l’un l’autre? Il me semble qu’il faut vraiment bien connaître ton partenaire pour pouvoir bien performer en Freefly Artistique.

Olga: Nous avons tous les deux fait partie de la première équipe d’instructeurs au SkyVenture Montréal. Étant donné que nous étions engagés pour le tunnel avant l’ouverture, on est allé au San Francisco pour faire notre formation.

Bruno: Nous avons travaillé ensemble pendant deux ans avant de décider de former une équipe.

 

Adam: Et pourquoi le Freefly Artistique? Pourquoi pas le VRV ou le VR?

Bruno: Olga avait beaucoup plus d’expérience que moi.  Elle à participé dans plusieurs compétitions et elle avait déjà fait un peu de Freefly Artistique.

 

Adam: Comment s’est passé la progression de Rise N Shine? Je suis certain que vous ne vous êtes pas simplement regardé le jour d’un tournoi et pensé “On va faire un équipe aujourd’hui”.

Bruno: Au faite, nous avons commencé ensemble en 2009. En 2010, l’équipe à été formé. En 2011, nous avons gagné les nationaux Canadiens. Et maintenant, nous sommes là en train de se préparer pour aller aux Mondiaux à Dubai en Décembre.

 

Adam: Depuis combien de temps faites-vous du parachute?

Olga: Mes premiers sauts étaient en Russie en 2003. Ils se trouvaient à être avec des parachutes ronds  militaires. Après cela, j’ai déménagé au Canada en 2004, et jusqu’à ce que je me suis organisé et finalement eu l’opportunité de faire mon cours PAC il était déjà 2005.

Bruno: J’ai commencé en 1999, mais j’ai eu une progression beaucoup plus lente. La plupart du temps, je faisais des fun jumps ici et là. Je ne portais pas trop d’attention à faire des compétitions. Pour moi, le parachute était pour m’amuser. Le facteur motivant arriva lorsque j’ai eu mon emploi au SkyVenture. J’ai realisé que j’aimais améliorer mes habilités constamment. Lorsque j’ai rencontré Olga, elle m’a coaché et mes habilités se sont améliorés exponentiellement. Les compétitions étaient une façon pour nous d’avoir un objectif fixe pour nous-mêmes.

Olga: C’était un but que nous nous sommes donné qui avait une date fixe donc nous n’avions pas de choix sauf d’être prêt pour ce moment là.

Adam: Je suis certain que vous entendez ceci souvent, mais pourquoi faites vous le parachute et encore plus, pourquoi participer dans des compétitions?

Olga: On le fait car c’est une façon qui nous aide à pousser d’autres parachutistes à essayer le sport et plus spécifiquement à essayer le Freefly Artistique. Le sport est relativement inconnu au Canada comparé l’Europe et aux États-Unis.

Bruno: Notre activité principale est de participer à des compétitions mais aussi de Coacher. Cela nous permet de partager nos passions et espérer d’amener plus de gens aux tournois. Et bien sur pour avoir plus d’amis avec qui jouer dans le ciel.

 

Adam: Dans quelles compétitions avez-vous participé? Mis à part bien sur celui de SkyVenture il y a quelques semaines.

Bruno: Au total, nous avions participé à deux compétitions de tunnel et une fois aux Nationaux. Mais 2011 était pas mal un an de planification ou nous avons préparé notre stratégie et formé l’équipe correctement. Avant une compétition, il y a beaucoup de préparations mentales qui prends énormément de temps à développer. Nous avions aussi eu besoin de rendre nos préparatifs plus efficaces et effectifs.

Olga: Nous sommes définitivement plus efficaces maintenant.

Bruno: Nous avons pris la 1ère place dans les Nationaux en 2011 qui nous permet d’aller aux Mondiaux à Dubai en Décembre 2012. Comme préparatif pour les Mondiaux, nous sommes aussi enregistrés pour participer aux Nationaux Américains en Novembre.

Olga: Avec nos expériences de 2011, nous pourrons nous serons beaucoup mieux préparés pour les compétitions dans le futur.

 

Adam: Et comment exactement se déroule un tournoi de Freefly Artistique?

Olga: Un tournoi consiste de sept rondes. Typiquement, les sept rondes sont comprises de cinq rondes de routines ouvertes ou l’équipe est libre de faire n’importe quoi tant que la routine qui à été soumise aux juges à été suivi. La plupart des équipes font la même routine cinq fois de suite car c’est plus facile d’apprendre une routine qu’il est d’en apprendre cinq différentes. Ces cinq rondes sont jugées par leur difficulté, l’esthétique et l’exécution de la routine. Il y a un barème que les juges utilisent pour décider combien de points qu’ils peuvent attribuer à leurs mouvements.

Bruno: Les deux autres rondes de compétition sont un peu différentes. L’équipe est encore libre de faire ce qu’ils veulent pendant la routine, mais les juges mettent quatre éléments qui doivent tous absolument apparaître dans la routine.

 

Adam: Donc pour simplifier, si ils demandent un salto arrière ou Olga fais son salto au dessus de toi, et un tonneau, tu peux faire un tonneau, par la suite, faire un switch et faire du head down et faire le tour l’un de l’autre et après faire le salto?

Bruno: Oui, mais tu dois garder en tête qu’il y a encore l’histoire du barème de difficulté. Si l’équipe choisis de faire quelque chose de très difficile et l’exécute mal, ils auront un pointage moins élevé qu’une équipe qui à choisi une routine plus simple et l’ont exécuté parfaitement.

 

Adam: Quel est vôtre mission exactement?

Bruno: Notre mission comme équipe est de nous entrainer, de faire des compétitions et bien sur de gagner. Mais avant tout, il est aussi d’aider à rendre le Freefly Artistique plus populaire.

 

Adam: Je vois beaucoup de logos sur vos jumpsuits, qui sont vos commanditaires principaux?

Bruno:
Parachutisme Voltige
SkyVenture Montréal
Frankais suits
Unites Parachute Technologies
Performance Designs
Cookie Composites
Brainshell
Float4 Interactive
Oberfeld Snowcap

Olga: Parachutisme Voltige et SkyVenture sont deux de nos commanditaires principaux. Ils sont directement liés à notre entrainement.

 

Ci dessous, une photo de Olga et Bruno portant leurs Jumpsuits Frankais et leurs casques Cookie (Le design est fait par Brainshell)
(Oui, je sais que je suis un photographe horrible et qu’il y a mon ombre dans la photo haha!)

 

Adam: Vous avez mentionné que le caméraman fait partie de l’équipe. Qui exactement est votre caméraman?

Bruno: L’année dernière nous avons travaillé avec Philippe Thibodeau qui à agi comme caméraman et à joué un rôle très important dans le lancement de l’équipe. Aujourd’hui, nôtre caméraman est Richard Guilbault. Philippe reste très impliqué comme coach.

 

Bruno: Artistic is less accessible at first as it’s much harder and needs more training, but once you learn it, it permits you much more than belly flying ever could.

J’aimerais remercier Rise N Shine pour avoir pris le temps de vous asseoir avec moi. Bruno et Philippe ont tous les deux pris le temps de me coacher dans le passé et Philippe à même entrainé Geneviève (Ma copine et photographe) à faire du sitfly.

Si jamais vous êtes au SkyVenture Montréal et vous voulez apprendre quelque chose de quelques parachutistes de haute niveau, demandez les, ils sont toujours heureux d’enseigner!

 

Vous pouvez les trouver sur:

Facebook

Youtube

Le site web Rise N Shine

Bien sur, si vous voulez les voir voler, allez simplement faire un tour à Voltige à Joliette, Québec une fin de semaine, vous aurez de bonnes chances d’être sur un load avec eux!

 

Blue skies tout le monde!

 

Adam

 

Posted on by — 5 Comments

Life Changing

It has been a while, my apologies – Life has made a few drastic turns, leaving my free time extremely limited.

 

Between juggling new projects at work, moving, and drop zone politics; life has been busy in most other areas as well, to say the least.

I am happy to say that amongst the chaos, there have been many great experiences since I last sat down to write: My jump numbers have increased to 252, I recently received my C-License YAY, I have started filming tandems and this past Saturday, I was able to do a display jump into our biggest air show in South Africa – This was an amazing experience that I had been aiming towards for a number of years. To top it all off, I jumped from a 1944 Piston driven Dakota “Marilyn” with many of my great friends. Naturally, this jump was promptly followed by BEERS, which was a great way to end off a great day!

In November & December 2011 I was in Tampa, Florida for my sister’s wedding, and I jumped at the opportunity to get some tunnel coaching with Luis Prinetto who was able to break some habits that I had formed with my sitfly and vastly improved my skydiving in general! On a side note: anyone wanting to improve their skydiving, regardless of skill level or discipline, I strongly recommend Luis – He is an excellent coach!

As I was Florida, I made sure that I visited a few drop zones to see what they are like when compared to our small DZ’s in South Africa, and man was I impressed! Before my trip last year, many people had told me that I would not be able to even imagine how much better skydiving in the States was than it is here – they were RIGHT. I made a few jumps at DeLand, Sebastian, Z-Hills and Tampa Bay – I really enjoyed all of them, but I cannot tell you which I prefer as I have not been able to decide.

I have a number of family members in Florida and it was really great being able to spend time with them all. My sister’s wedding was beautiful and she has married a really great guy that I have no doubt will be a great husband for her. Oddly enough, her husband grew up in South Africa, roughly 30 minutes away from her, and his father knows my dad from business many years ago. It’s amazing how small the world has become.

I got home from my amazing US holiday with an open mind – it was my third trip to the States, but my first as an “adult”. My friends have been trying to work out why I choose to stay in South Africa when I am a US Citizen. The question that is very common for me is “but you have an American Passport, why are you still here?”. Up until this point, my answer was simple and standard: “I love South Africa”. For those of you who are not familiar with this country, it truly is beautiful; we have 12 months of fantastic weather, great beaches, mountains and wonderful natural sights around the country, all within a few hours of where I live. Unfortunately though, it does have some bad points as well. Crime and a dysfunctional government have many people worried about its long-term future. This aside, I still love the place and will always call it my home.

Anyway (I digress), I have booked myself a one-way ticket to Florida, resigned from my job, and am in the process of getting everything in order for my big move on the 1st of October, 2012.

The decision to move 8422 Miles was not an easy one to make! I have amazing friends, (had) a great job which I enjoyed and allowed me to skydive. Not to mention that it means leaving my parents, sister, brother-in-law and two nephews here, as well as many other people and opportunities.

I have never been one to make a list of PRO’s and CON’s as I’m generally quite spontaneous, this decision however, took a number of weeks to make. There was one major deciding factor: I want to skydive! Although amazing and filled with great people, our DZ’s here are too small for me to give skydiving a real go. I love working with students and have been coaching and jump-mastering for about a year. I love freeflying and I love flying my canopy, FAST!

So – I have come to the conclusion that in order for me to be able to progress as much as I would like to in the sport, there is only one option: Move to Florida!

I’m unbelievably excited, nervous, sad and outright TERRIFIED – it’s a strange combination of feelings.

I’m  extremely analytical and try to find answers and reasons for every situation, I research and analyze every possible scenario and outcome for every situation in my life (it’s a bit annoying), but with this, I’m just stepping out of my comfort zone, a leap of faith, if you will. There are LOTS of unanswered questions about this move; will I be able to get a decent job? How long will it take to find a job? Will I be able to get on my feet quickly? Am I going to be imposing on my family by staying with them while I get on my feet? Will I enjoy the States, How long am I going to give it? And of course, which DZ do I make my home!!?? But, I’m going against my better judgement and ignoring the part of myself that wants answers. I’m just going to wing it and see where life takes me.

I preach that people step out of their comfort zones and “live a little”, it’s a bit ironic considering how shit scared I am to do the same. Haha. For the first time, I am taking my own advise because I know it’s for the best. I will just have to let you all know how it turns out.

Blue Skies and Happy Days!

~Lance

Posted on by — 5 Comments

What a week for Canadian skydiving!

Hey everyone!

Sorry about the delay on the posts, I had quite a setback with my move, just getting back into the swing of things.

 

So this week was quite an insane week for Canadian skydiving in Quebec. It started with Mission 100, the Lemay family’s 2 year project. (For those of you who don’t know, the Lemay family are also known as team Evolution, they are and have been team Canada for 4 way relative work for many years. They also happen to operate two drop zones in Quebec and part of Skyventure Montreal.)

Mission 100 was first attempted in 2011, but unfortunately didn’t pan out after a few attempts. So they decided to give it a whirl in 2012 a second time. 102 skydivers participated, and 102 skydivers made the formation.

Here is what it looked like from below:

(Picture by Andrew Toman of the Hired Guns – Parachute Montreal)

This was a HUGE event for Canadian skydiving, and it is sure to be remembered by at least 102 people who now have their names in the record books!

 

The second is equally as impressive, but completely different in it’s own way:

This past weekend was the Go Big boogie at Voltige 2001 a weekend oriented around big ways. 17 000 foot skydives, 3 caravans and lots of smiling faces!

They broke the Canadian head down record with 29 people!!!

Unfortunately, I don’t have a photo of the record, but as soon as I do get my hands on one, it’ll be on our Facebook page!

 

I’d like to congratulate everyone who participated on a job well done!

And I want to give a shout out to the organizers of these events as without people like them, skydiving would be a lot less organized. =)

 

Blue skies everyone!

 

Adam

Posted on by — Leave a comment

I’m still alive… Barely

Hey everyone!

So I’ve gotten some e-mails asking me where the interview of Rise N’ Shine is and what’s going on, so I figured I’d fill all of you in. I moved over the weekend and am still sort of recovering from some events that happened then.
I’ve been writing up the interview in both English and french during my free bits of time. Be patient, it’s well worth it!

PS: I want to thank UPT and NZ Aeroports for their generosity, they were nice enough to send me some SWAG to give away at Boogie Fest, hope to see you all there!

Blue ones!

Adam

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Coming soon: Interview with Rise n’ Shine

Hey everyone!

I got the chance to interview Rise n’ Shine, Canada’s Artistic Freefly champions today.

Here’s their promo video:

 

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mz2HhOSVqzo&feature=plcp[/youtube]

 

The interview will be posted soon. 🙂

Blue skies!

Adam

 

 

Salut tout le monde!

Aujourd’hui, j’ai eu l’opportunité de faire un entrevue avec Rise n’ Shine, L’équipe championne Canadienne de Freefly Artistique.

Voici leur vidéo promotionnelle:

 

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mz2HhOSVqzo&feature=plcp[/youtube]

 

L’entrevue va être posté bientot! 🙂

 

Ciel Bleu!

Adam

Posted on by — Leave a comment

International Bodyflight Association indoor skydiving championship – Skyventure

Hey everyone!

 

So last week was the International Bodyflight Association indoor skydiving championship at Skyventure Montreal.
This was the first of it’s kind in Quebec and it was an enormous success!

There were several different events including rookie, intermediate and open levels for FS and VFS and plenty of action!

There are WAY too many medal winners to mention, but you can see all the pictures on the IBA’s facebook page.

They also have a bunch of videos from the event on their youtube page.

 

I plan to have an interview with Rise n’ Shine (One of the competitors and locally sponsored athletes) in the coming weeks so look out for that one!

Congrats to all the winners!

 

Adam

Posted on by — 1 Comment

Scary reason why…

This is the scary reality why skydivers should NEVER fly their canopies close to each other without proper CReW training.
This guy is EXTREMELY lucky to even be alive, unfortunately he is now quadriplegic… Let this be a lesson to those of you who are considering trying the sport without having the proper experience and/or taking lessons.

 

[error]Not a YouTube, Vimeo or Google Video URL: http://youtu.be/_9fHrJbj1SY[/error]

 

 

Please, be careful in the skies, you never know what might happen.

 

Blue ones!

 

Adam

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Delays

So my girlfriend was quite unfortunate and caught labyrinthitis last week. Due to this, she wasn’t able to skydive and we had to push the hang gliding back a bit.
I’m heading back to Victoriaville this weekend and the weather’s looking nice, so hopefully that’ll give me the chance to head to the DZ for some jumps and some fun in the sky.

 

Quickie for all of you today, hope you enjoyed the last article.

 

Blue ones till Monday,

 

Adam

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Interesting article

So this past weekend was fairly rainy, so I didn’t get the opportunity to do any skydiving while I was in Victoriaville visiting my girlfriend, however I did get the chance to give her her birthday gift. I’m taking her Hang gliding.

I know it’s not skydive related, but she’s already a skydiver (with more jumps than I have I might add) so what do you get someone who already loves the sky? A completely new experience that will throw her off guard! =D

We’re planning on going within the next couple of weeks, so look out for an article about our experience with that.

 

I came across an article on the PD website about Pack Volumes that is quite interesting as most skydivers don’t seem to think about that when buying their canopies/containers. Different canopies pack differently and each type has a different total volume when packed, this article talks a bit about it, figured I’d share it with all of you.

Pack Volume: The Untold Story

by: Ian Bellis

“How big does it pack?”, “Will it fit in my container?”, “I’ll buy the one that packs smaller”.

How many times have you asked or heard someone ask these types of questions?

Pack volume has become a major advertising point for manufacturers and a decision making factor for purchases, but before you go out and buy the “smallest packing canopy” of a given size There are a few things you should know:

I. Canopy Size:  “All 170’s are not created equal”

 

Q. When you see a canopy advertised as 170 square feet, how big do you think it really is? The answer may surprise you…

A. It all depends on the measuring method! Canopies can have their span (wingtip to wingtip) and chord (nose to tail) measured in different locations. Which locations are used can have a significant impact on the resulting numbers. P.I.A. attempted to devise a method which would standardize the measurement of canopy area. There were problems inherent in this method however, and based upon the resulting variance, which are due to factors in the construction of canopies, we cannot use these numbers to accurately compare one manufacturer=s canopy to another. This has resulted in the current situation where the different manufacturers have addressed the “area question” with their own measuring methods. Each method has a certain validity to it. There is no one correct method, however everyone should be aware of the following: Whether it is top surface or bottom surface, along the curve of the airfoil or along the chordline (see fig. 1), the resulting area can easily vary by 10%-20%! What this means is that unless you are comparing two canopies within a certain manufacturers measuring method, you cannot directly compare the advertised area of one to another! If one manufacturer measured another’s canopy, they would undoubtedly advertise it as a different size. Even if the sizes were identical, the airfoil size and shape alone could significantly affect the volume of the canopy, not to mention its flight and landing characteristics.

Another aspect is whether a canopy is measured while laying flat on the ground or if the measurements are based on the canopy’s configuration while inflated. Once a canopy inflates, its “actual” surface area is quite different (smaller) than if it was measured lying flat. The reason for this is the distortion of the cells when actually inflated and flying (see fig. 2). The important thing to remember is the size of the inflated and flying canopy is what you will have to land.

The bottom line here is, you might not have as much canopy over your head or reserve packed in your container as you think…

 

II. Construction Method

 

Q. If you have two canopies of the same size (measured the same way of course), then they should have the same pack volume?

A. Not necessarily. The type and amount of reinforcing tapes, types of seams, the number of ribs, air locks, etc. will all play a part in the pack volume. In the final analysis, the more fabric, tapes etc. in a given canopy, the larger the pack volume. This is something each individual needs to decide on their own in terms of its worth. While some people might accept a slightly larger pack volume for a reserve with more reinforcement, they might not feel the same way when it comes to their main. It is up to you, the important thing is to understand the difference in construction, their benefits and drawbacks, and then make an informed decision on which canopy to buy.

 

III. Fabric Type and Related Variances

 

Q. Why does one type of fabric have a larger pack volume than another?

A. Several reasons for this one:
Fabric thickness is one aspect. Different types and production runs of fabric have different
thicknesses. This affects the pack volume of the fabric itself.

Zero porosity vs. Low porosity (F111 type):

While most people assume 0P fabric packs larger than low porosity, in part due to its thickness, the more important factor is the person packing it. We have all seen individuals who can pack a 0P canopy of a given size into a container easily, while that same canopy container combination would give others “fits” trying to pack it. This is obviously not due to any change in the pack volume of the canopy. The truth is, it is easier to maintain control of low porosity fabric while packing, which allows the average person to pack it noticeably smaller. Zero porosity fabric has great advantages in longevity and consistency of performance though. One option for people who do not want to deal with the packing of zero porosity, but would still like some of the benefits in longevity and performance, are canopies constructed of a combination of zero porosity and low porosity fabrics. At least two major manufacturers offer canopies of this description.

 

Zero porosity vs. Zero porosity:

Some people believe that, all things being equal, (which we have already stated is almost never the case) one 0P canopy would pack the same as another. Not true. “Not all 0P fabric is created equal”. The different methods for producing the yarn, weaving the fabric and processing this woven fabric into low porosity or “zero porosity” can have a great impact on the pack volume. It can also have an effect on the longevity of the zero porosity aspect of the fabric. Not all 0P fabric remains 0P. While this change could result in easier packing, it may not be desirable in terms of opening, flight and landing characteristics (another subject for another article). Suffice it to say, if you are not sure about the fabric used in a particular canopy, ask the manufacturer about any long term porosity testing they have done.

Fabric lots:

Even with the same type of fabric from the same manufacturer, there can be variances of 30%-50% from one fabric lot to another! Amazing as this might seem, this is an area that no parachute manufacturer can control. Parachute manufacturers buy their fabric from textile manufacturers and much as we would like it to be otherwise, this variance is inherent in the fabric manufacturing process. While it does not affect the fabric structurally, it does have the stated impact on pack volume. Everything involved from the drawing of filaments, to weaving those filaments into fabric which is then processed into low porosity or zero porosity “canopy fabric” incorporate processes which can change the ultimate pack volume of a canopy. One aspect which is often overlooked is what is known as the “hand” of the fabric. This is the ease with which a fabric can be folded, pretty important when you consider that’s all packing is. A fabric with a “soft hand” will pack smaller than a fabric with a “stiff hand”. The best analogy used to explain this concept to me was the “wet paper” analogy. Take a piece of paper and wad it up into a ball as tightly as you can, now take another piece of paper (the same size) and wet it, now ball that piece up. Which one is smaller? The wet paper would be said to have a “soft hand” the dry paper a “firm hand”.

IV. Testing Methodology

 

Q. If I use the P.I.A. chart, won=t I be able to get an unbiased comparison of pack volumes?

A. This is a valid question that gets asked often. P.I.A. has attempted to provide an objective listing of pack volumes. The problem is that the current equipment and methodology for arriving at the P.I.A. pack volume numbers is not 100% repeatable. What I mean is, the same person can test the same canopy twice using the same technique and still obtain significantly different results. How can this be? As hard as P.I.A. has tried, the equipment and the test cannot alleviate many potential variables. It involves a volume chamber, which is basically a graduated cylinder manufactured to specific dimensions, and the application of weight to a canopy placed in this cylinder. The canopy can be placed in the chamber differently; the required weights can be placed on the canopy with or without applying pressure, etc. The current temperature and humidity can have an impact as well. Although P.I.A. has employed a procedure which arrives at an average value from multiple tests, the results are volumes that we cannot objectively compare. The P.I.A. chart itself shows the difficulty of the task. Although P.I.A. has attempted to eliminate as many variables as possible, the chart still shows a seven cell PD-235 (700 cubic inches) as having a larger volume than a nine cell PD-260 (650 cubic inches). This difference would lead one to believe the smaller 7 cell packs larger than the 9 cell, even though the 9 cell has similar construction methods, 25 square feet more area, 2 additional cells, and more suspension lines! This is not very likely. Several companies are currently trying to devise their own testing methods, but until a consistent method is developed that all parachute manufacturers utilize, we cannot compare one canopy to another in any meaningful way.

V. Summary

 

Q. So what does it all mean?

A. The statement “the numbers never lie” is not always true, as shown here. Luckily, most canopy manufacturers provide canopies to the container manufacturers for sizing purposes. The container manufacturers are therefore an excellent source to determine canopy-container compatibility. A few recommendations from the author regarding canopy pack volume:

1. Never base your purchasing decision on pack volume.

The numbers you are using may be deceiving.

2. Decide on canopy model and size before container size.

It is not the container you will have to fly and land for hundreds or thousands of jumps in all conditions (bad spots, high winds, turbulence, etc). While certainly your harness must fit  properly, the container size itself should be based solely on your canopy choice. To do otherwise would be akin to finding a set of wheels that you like the looks of and then purchasing your car to fit them (doesn’t make much sense, does it?)

3. Test jump a canopy before purchasing.

Many companies offer demo programs on both mains and reserves, use them. Do not put a canopy in your container (especially a reserve) without giving yourself the opportunity to fly and land the same model and size under “controlled conditions”. You may find that a “small packing reserve” is not as big as you think. It may not be a canopy you would feel comfortable landing under all circumstances. The same is true of the main. Would you buy a car without a test drive?

4. Choose your canopy size based on the “worst case scenario”.

If you can “just barely” pull off a landing in the landing area, with a bit of wind, you probably should look at another (larger) inflated size and/or model.

5. Be careful accepting advice from the local “sky gods”.

In some cases they may have forgotten what it was like to be at your experience level. What seems normal or “conservative” to them now, would have been a canopy they wouldn’t even consider when they were at your level.

6. Utilize the experience of the people building your equipment.

If you have questions, get your dealer to ask the container or canopy manufacturers or call them yourself.

7. When choosing a canopy size and model, take into account several factors:

Your current canopy (frame of reference), your currency (number of jumps per year, layoffs due to season, etc.), your pilot profile (conservative, aggressive, etc.), your experience (how many jumps, what types of canopies), your home DZ (small or large landing area, quantity and location of alternate landing sites, etc.).

8. Choose your canopies wisely…

When you find yourself wishing you had more canopy over your head in order to make it back from a bad spot or land your reserve off field, it’s too late.

VI. Conclusions

 

Too much emphasis has been placed on pack volumes. We need to remember that it is just a

“numbers game”. We can see that comparing the “pack volumes” of canopies may not have any corresponding impact on our ability to pack a given main or reserve into a given container. The first thing is to choose your canopies based on performance characteristics (opening, flight, and landing), then factor in the ease of packing (not the volume), 0P vs. F111 vs. combination. Then ask the container manufacturer of your choice what size container accepts your canopy choices. If you stick to this method you will have a system that is easy to pack and performs the way you would like.

 

Posted on by — Leave a comment

BEER LINE!!!!!!

So this weekend had some amazing weather!

Went to Voltige Saturday night with my girlfriends, had a few beers by the campfire, crashed in a buddy’s trailer on the table we were 8 or 9 people sleeping there haha!

So come Sunday morning, the day began with a 14 way that I woke up too late to participate in, but I got to watch from the ground. Only 2 or 3 people made it back and Skygod bless them for taking it upon themselves to figure out the winds and walk the 2 miles back so that we don’t have to lol!

 

My day started off with a 5 way that involved my girlfriend and 3 others. We planned to do “Doughnut, star – right, doughnut, star-left then caterpillar (for those of you who don’t understand that, it’s basically the names of the formations we did, doughnut is a circle, star is when people turn in that direction and caterpillar is basically where people are a zig zag in the sky).

 

The exit went to hell but we managed to recover it and got our 1st point done however, on the 1st star attempt, I lost altitude and couldn’t catch up in time. On the landing, I tried practicing lower altitude turns (still at about 300 feet) to be able to get some speed and work on my control. The landing went smoothly and I got a fairly nice swoop out of it.

As soon as I landed however, I was rushed to catch my “taxi” (a pick-up truck waiting for me) to get back on the plane as I was informed that I was going to fly with two friends of mine who were on a tandem on the next load. The load was supposed to be one later, but got pushed up. Needless to say, I was rushing like hell and the plane was waiting for me at the end of the runway. At this point, I noticed a huge crack in the visor of my factory diver. =( So I unfortunately had to order a new one.

I was the only non tandem skydiver on the plane, so I decided to myself that I’d do a high altitude opening (10 000 feet) and work on my canopy flying skills. I also got to push everyone out of the way while creeping to the back of the plane haha!

I was working on my front riser controls during this flight, got myself kind of dizzy though and nearly puked inside my now “broken visor” helmet. Wasn’t fun, but I kinda laughed to myself for my weak stomach.
Come time to land, I did the same thing as the last jump, but went out slightly farther so I’d have more room. But this time, I noticed something…. There was no wind in my face… Instead of slowing down, I just kept moving forward farther and farther until I was about 20 feet from the picnic tables… Evasive maneuver time! I flared early, ended up stalling at about 7 feet in the air and landed on my knees about 5 feet from the crowd of people who were all cheering… Why were they cheering you ask? Not because I didn’t hit them… But because I had passed the beer line and I now owed a case of beer.

The tandem masters all came and thanked me, and all day I kept being reminded about how I owed beer haha!

I still owe that beer and I plan on bringing it to Voltige in a few weeks when I go back to do my 100th jump with Nicolas Huard (One of the DZOs) who will be taking me on my 1st CRW jump.

I’m stoked as hell!

I’ll be in Victoriaville this weekend, hopefully back at the DZ if the weather permits, so I’ll have a new post for you guys then and possibly a surprise or two before hand.

 

Blue ones in the meantime everyone!

 

Adam