Over the course of the last year, I’ve been truly blessed to have the opportunity to travel to some amazing dropzones. What I’ve come to find is that each has it’s own unique set of qualities and it’s own unique group of jumpers.
This definitely keeps things interesting.
When it comes to issues like safety, I’ve come to find that each dropzone has their “danger zone” – that one element of the sport where there is constant discussion regarding jumper safety. Seems that every dropzone has their area(s) where they proceed with much caution.
This really came to my attention this weekend when the debate continued regarding canopy downsizing.
As I forgot to mention a couple weeks ago, I decided not to purchase that Sabre 2-120 I had been demoing. Not due to the size, but due to inconsistent and incredibly odd openings. It gave me gear fear, and that’s not how it should be. I really came to realize this after demoing another Sabre2-120 that opened perfectly every time. So needless to say, I’m back on my Sabre 1-150 for the time being – at least until my wallet will allow me to buy new.
The experts at CSC all questioned why I purchased the 150 in the first place, stating that with my weight I should be on a smaller canopy. There goes that mixed message again.
So it got me to thinking about the areas of the sport where safety is a main focus and the differences between dropzones I have visited. Come to find out, almost ALL of them vary widely. These are definitely things that set dropzones apart from one another. Check this out:
- The folks at one dropzone I have frequented are extremely hesitant when it comes to downsizing. The focus is on the size of the canopy rather than the wingloading. However, most of these people don’t bat an eye when it comes to wingsuiting or camera flying.
- On the total opposite end of that spectrum, I’ve visited a dropzone that was hesitant to put anyone with less than 500 jumps in a wingsuit, but they highly encourage jumpers to test out canopy size and find what works for them – stressing wingloading rather than fearing size. (Though don’t get me wrong, neither of these dropzones are negligent or ignorant of the safety behind any issue, they just have those areas where they’re more likely to proceed with caution).
- There’s a local dropzone that’s extremely strict on the rule of not flying a camera before you have 200 jumps, though I’ve been on loads where they don’t hesitate to throw jumpers out through “industrial haze” so thick it’s a guessing game when it comes to locating the LZ.
- Then there’s the dropzone where jumpers on the flight will have the pilot do two or three go-arounds just to ensure that everyone on the flight will be able to avoid the clouds at a significant distance but they don’t hesitate to throw jumpers out in high, turbulent winds.
- I’ve also been to a dropzone that in general is very strict. So much so that until you have 500 skydives, you can be grounded for any of the following: not having an AAD, freeflying with another jumper if you both don’t have 500 skydives, trying to jump in winds higher than 15 mph, wingsuiting or camera flying. Though, this very same dropzone has ZERO rules about swooping. Anyone, anywhere, anytime.
- Then there are the dropzones that have strict swooping rules, these jumpers are often confined to specific areas of the LZ and you will be grounded if you don’t abide by them. Of course, these dropzones have their areas where they turn a blind eye as well.
- Some dropzones don’t care if you jump barefoot, others won’t even think twice about it.
I’m sure the list goes on, but this is just off the top of my head. It’s amazing how much dropzone policy can differ from one to the next.
And yes, I’m keeping this vague. Who am I to call out dropzones on their policies. I’m no one, that’s who!
For the most part, the majority of dropzones I’ve visited are very safety conscious. Most have pretty strict landing patterns, or at least they encourage safe canopy piloting based on location and conditions. Most are incredibly strict on BSRs, though camera flying has been split about 50/50 when it comes to that 200 jump requirement.
Anyhow, this is just an observation that I found interesting and wanted to share. Though if you’re looking for my opinion, for what it’s worth, I say proceed with caution in every aspect of the sport. Safety should always come first. Know your limits, be aware of those around you and always pay attention.
That is all.
2 thoughts on “DZ Differences”
[…] Addiction. This is the newest group blog out there and one I’m honored to be a part of. My latest post talks about differences among dropzones, given my travel […]
I say this often, hear it often and always add it where it fits…
Slow is fast 🙂
You’re absolutely right, I’ve noticed that everywhere I go I have different rules.
Canada in general is big on that. Quebec DZs all fly to 13500 (except one), but people never open below 3000 feet.
In Ontario, opening at 2200-2500 is considered very normal. I know that people are trying to get the most out of their altitude, but I mean that’s starting to get low…
What happens when an inexperienced jumper has to cut away?
Panic ensues first, 5 seconds lost, then 5 seconds to try to get things working, then another 2.5-5 for the cutaway, and you’re at like 800-1000 feet… 300-500 feet for the reserve to open, by the time they’re at the toggles, they’re at the ground.
I’m exaggerating a little, but not much really.
When I was doing my PFF in Florida at Zhills, people from Quebec were allowed flying at 16mph, while the American students were grounded.
Our instructor just gave us slightly higher wing loading and said “go ahead, you’re safe, I’ve seen you land”
I learned quite a bit that way, but at the same time, at that level, looking back on it, it wasn’t exactly the safest plan…